1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1964 Rover P6
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Rover P6 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Rover P6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1964 Rover P6.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Rover P6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Rover P6 (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1964 Rover P6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1964 Rover P6 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | CJ7 | P6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2630 mm |