1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Volvo 144 (100 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Volvo 144 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Volvo 144. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Volvo 144 (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Volvo 144 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ7 | 144 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2620 mm |