1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1971 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Jeep | NSU |
| Model | CJ7 | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1971 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2870 mm |
