1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1973 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Lancia Fulvia (90 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 333 kg more than 1973 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Lancia Fulvia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Lancia Fulvia. (114 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1973 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Jeep | Lancia |
Model | CJ7 | Fulvia |
Year Released | 1982 | 1973 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2340 mm |