1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1989 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1989 Toyota MR2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Toyota MR2 (221 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1989 Toyota MR2.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Toyota MR2 (305 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1989 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ7 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2410 mm |