1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda MX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ7 | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1059 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2460 mm |