1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1999 Renault Zo

To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 285 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7.

Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Renault Zo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1982 Jeep CJ7 has manual transmission. 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: