1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision (189 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | CJ7 | Vision |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 189 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2940 mm |
