1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. Both 1982 Jeep CJ7 and 2000 Toyota Celica are equipped with a 1,995 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | CJ7 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 622 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |
