1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2002 McLaren F1
To start off, 2002 McLaren F1 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 6,063 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 McLaren F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 McLaren F1 (618 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 533 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 McLaren F1 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 114 kg more than 2002 McLaren F1.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 McLaren F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 McLaren F1 (649 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 McLaren F1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2002 McLaren F1 | |
Make | Jeep | McLaren |
Model | CJ7 | F1 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 6063 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 618 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 649 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |