1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B4000 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 377 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B4000 (310 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ7 | B4000 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1667 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3200 mm |