1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano (270 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CJ7 | Viano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3210 mm |