1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 462 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 600 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Jeep | Pagani |
| Model | CJ7 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |
