1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (182 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 194 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Saturn L. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (250 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Jeep | Saturn |
Model | CJ7 | L |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |