1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 404 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Subaru Outback (285 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ7 | Outback |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1694 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |