1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (170 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | CJ7 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2500 mm |
