1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (150 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ7 | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |