1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2008 Suzuki Liana
To start off, 2008 Suzuki Liana is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Suzuki Liana (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Suzuki Liana should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2008 Suzuki Liana.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Suzuki Liana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Suzuki Liana (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Suzuki Liana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2008 Suzuki Liana | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ7 | Liana |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1207 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |