1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook

To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.

Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Saturn Outlook. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 1982 Jeep CJ7 has manual transmission. 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: