1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2011 Audi Q7
To start off, 2011 Audi Q7 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 5,394 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi Q7 (493 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 434 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi Q7 (1,000 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 872 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7. 2011 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 1982 Jeep CJ7 has manual transmission. 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2011 Audi Q7 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ7 | Q7 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 5394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 493 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 1000 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 5088 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1737 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3002 mm |
