1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2011 Honda Civic
To start off, 2011 Honda Civic is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Civic (198 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 38 kg more than 2011 Honda Civic.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda Civic (193 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm). This means 2011 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2011 Honda Civic | |
Make | Jeep | Honda |
Model | CJ7 | Civic |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 198 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 193 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1267 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1445 mm |