1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q3 (168 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q3 (280 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7. 2012 Audi Q3 has automatic transmission and 1982 Jeep CJ7 has manual transmission. 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi Q3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | CJ7 | Q3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |