1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 13 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Jeep CJ7 2013 Mazda 3
Make Jeep Mazda
Model CJ7 3
Year Released 1982 2013
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Vehicle Weight 1290 kg 1303 kg
Vehicle Length 3900 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2640 mm