1982 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2013 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2013 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Subaru Tribeca (252 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 647 kg more than 1982 Jeep CJ7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Subaru Tribeca (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Subaru Tribeca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Jeep CJ7 | 2013 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ7 | Tribeca |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1937 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4865 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2256 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2745 mm |