1982 Kia Brisa vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 1,273 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan AA-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan AA-X weights approximately 470 kg more than 1982 Kia Brisa.
Because 1982 Kia Brisa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Kia Brisa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Kia Brisa | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Brisa | AA-X |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 985 cc | 1273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1260 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2530 mm |