1982 Kia Brisa vs. 2010 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2010 Ford Fusion is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Fusion weights approximately 897 kg more than 1982 Kia Brisa.
Because 1982 Kia Brisa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Kia Brisa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Kia Brisa | 2010 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Kia | Ford |
Model | Brisa | Fusion |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 985 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4841 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2728 mm |