1982 Kia Brisa vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A3 (158 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1982 Kia Brisa. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Kia Brisa.
Because 1982 Kia Brisa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Kia Brisa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Kia Brisa | 2011 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Kia | Audi |
| Model | Brisa | A3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 985 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
