1982 Lada 1200 vs. 2005 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2005 Lancia Zeta is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lancia Zeta (135 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1982 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 655 kg more than 1982 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lancia Zeta (186 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada 1200. 2005 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1982 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1982 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada 1200 | 2005 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Lada | Lancia |
| Model | 1200 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1196 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 80 L |
