1982 Lada 1200 vs. 2005 Mercury Montego
To start off, 2005 Mercury Montego is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Montego is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Montego (203 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Lada 1200. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Montego should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Montego weights approximately 711 kg more than 1982 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Montego, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Montego (281 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada 1200. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Montego will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada 1200 | 2005 Mercury Montego | |
Make | Lada | Mercury |
Model | 1200 | Montego |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1196 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 203 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 281 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 72 L |