1982 Lada 1200 vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Camry (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1982 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 385 kg more than 1982 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Camry (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada 1200. 2008 Toyota Camry has automatic transmission and 1982 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1982 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Toyota Camry will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada 1200 | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Lada | Toyota |
Model | 1200 | Camry |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1196 cc | 3311 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 70 L |