1982 Lada 2105 vs. 1961 Mini MK I
To start off, 1982 Lada 2105 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lada 2105 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lada 2105 (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lada 2105 should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lada 2105 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada 2105 | 1961 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Lada | Mini |
| Model | 2105 | MK I |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 847 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2040 mm |
