1982 Lada 2105 vs. 1998 Lotus 340 R
To start off, 1998 Lotus 340 R is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus 340 R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1982 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lada 2105 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada 2105 | 1998 Lotus 340 R | |
| Make | Lada | Lotus |
| Model | 2105 | 340 R |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2320 mm |
