1982 Lada 2105 vs. 2004 Rover 25
To start off, 2004 Rover 25 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 25 (83 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1982 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 25 weights approximately 86 kg more than 1982 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada 2105 | 2004 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Lada | Rover |
| Model | 2105 | 25 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1086 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |
