1982 Lada 2105 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1982 Lada 2105. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1982 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada 2105. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada 2105 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Lada | Volvo |
Model | 2105 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2860 mm |