1982 Lada 2105 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva (227 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1982 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 965 kg more than 1982 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada 2105. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada 2105 | 2011 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
Model | 2105 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2710 mm |