1982 Lada 2105 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 489 more horse power than 1982 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 914 kg more than 1982 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada 2105 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Lada | Cadillac |
Model | 2105 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 548 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2880 mm |