1982 Lada Niva vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada Niva would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 767 more horse power than 1982 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lada Niva weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1982 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 880 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada Niva. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada Niva | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Lada | Lotec |
Model | Niva | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1150 mm |