1982 Lada Niva vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada Niva would be higher. At 1,451 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Lada Niva. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada Niva.
Because 1982 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada Niva. (110 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada Niva | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Lada | Holden |
Model | Niva | Cruze |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2685 mm |