1982 Lada S vs. 1965 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1982 Lada S is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lada S weights approximately 118 kg more than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Because 1982 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada S | 1965 Peugeot 204 | |
| Make | Lada | Peugeot |
| Model | S | 204 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 54 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 882 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |
