1982 Lada S vs. 1996 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1996 Lancia Zeta is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 650 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Because 1982 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 1996 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Lada | Lancia |
Model | S | Zeta |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |