1982 Lada S vs. 2001 Mazda 6
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Because 1982 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 2001 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | S | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |