1982 Lada S vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lada S weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1982 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Lada | MCC |
Model | S | Smart |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 47 L |