1982 Lada S vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 875 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S has automatic transmission and 1982 Lada S has manual transmission. 1982 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 2004 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | S | S |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 88 L |