1982 Lada S vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada S | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Lada | Citroen |
| Model | S | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
