1982 Lada S vs. 2010 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2010 Ford Kuga is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Kuga weights approximately 540 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Because 2010 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 2010 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Lada | Ford |
Model | S | Kuga |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 53 L |