1982 Lada S vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 781 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1982 Lada S has manual transmission. 1982 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
Model | S | Equinox |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1781 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 71 L |