1982 Lada S vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1982 Lada S has manual transmission. 1982 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lada S | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Lada | Dodge |
| Model | S | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2018 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 72 L |
