1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 1300 would be higher.
Because 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Triumph |
| Model | Marco Polo | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 61 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
