1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo vs. 2001 Mazda Atenza
To start off, 2001 Mazda Atenza is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo would be higher.
Because 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Atenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda Atenza has automatic transmission and 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo has manual transmission. 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda Atenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo | 2001 Mazda Atenza | |
Make | Lamborghini | Mazda |
Model | Marco Polo | Atenza |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |