1982 Lancia A 112 vs. 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 1990 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Pontiac Trans Am weights approximately 1026 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 1990 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Pontiac Trans Am has automatic transmission and 1982 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Pontiac Trans Am will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Lancia A 112 | 1990 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Lancia | Pontiac |
| Model | A 112 | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1681 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2570 mm |
